ROBOT IDENTITY + PROVENANCE

A robot claim is useful only when you know which robot it describes and where the claim came from.

Identity answers what entity or configuration is being described. Provenance records the source, evidence path, verification state and derivation behind the claims attached to that identity.

CITATION RECORDCanonical source ↗
MATURITYREFERENCE EXPLAINER + IMPLEMENTED SITE EVIDENCE MODEL
LAST VERIFIED22 Sep 2026
SOURCE VERSIONOpenRGD 0.2.0 integrity model + catalog assertion evidence model
EVIDENCE BOUNDARYSource review, normalization and independent testing remain distinct evidence states.

IDENTITY LAYERS

Model identity, configuration identity and physical-instance identity are not the same thing.

01

Model identity

The commercial or canonical robot model, such as a Unitree G1 or a Comau Racer-5-0.80 COBOT.

02

Variant / configuration

A specific option set, edition or hardware configuration can change DoF, compute, sensors or payload.

03

Profile identity

An OpenRGD profile has its own identity and integrity commitment for the exact machine-readable configuration being evaluated.

04

Physical instance

A real deployed robot may additionally need serial, calibration, firmware and lifecycle identity beyond the generic model.

05

Source identity

Evidence must retain which document, manufacturer page, dataset or artifact produced the assertion.

06

Temporal identity

Claims can change over time, so valid-from, valid-to and verification dates matter.

PROVENANCE PIPELINE

Preserve the path from evidence to interpretation.

01Primary source
02Raw assertion
03Normalization
04Verification state
05Canonical entity
06Site-specific interpretation
07Derived RGD context

The critical rule is non-retroactivity: later interpretation should not silently rewrite the historical evidence that supported an earlier claim. OpenRGD’s reconciliation work applies the same principle to recovered artifacts and candidate contracts.

VERIFIED ≠ INDEPENDENTLY TESTED

Evidence quality needs more than one boolean.

A manufacturer-stated specification can be accurately captured and source-reviewed without being independently measured. OpenRGD.org therefore keeps evidence type, verification status and independent testing as separate fields. This prevents a reviewed product-page claim from being presented as laboratory validation.

CONTENT IDENTITY

A hash proves which content you have — not who approved it or whether it is correct.

The canonical OpenRGD repository uses OPENRGD_SOURCE_TREE_SHA256_V1 to commit the selected modular source tree. Repository guidance explicitly separates content identity from authorship, governance acceptance, compatibility and physical safety. The same distinction is useful for robot data: integrity is one layer of trust, not the whole trust model.

IMPORT PROVENANCE

Source-derived robot evidence should stay distinguishable from later enrichment.

The current OpenRGD importers record source filename, format, byte length and SHA-256 while extracting only supported Foundation evidence. Identity, safety policy, cognition and hardware authorization are not inferred from URDF or USDA. Later enrichment is therefore a separate operation with a separate provenance story.

OPENRGD.ORG EVIDENCE MODEL

Entity pages can expose claims instead of hiding them behind a polished specification table.

The OpenRGD.org catalog stores robot assertions separately from the canonical robot row. An assertion can carry its property, normalized value, evidence type, verification state, source URL, verification date, validity window and whether independent testing is recorded. The public robot pages now surface that distinction directly.

PRIMARY SOURCES