OPENRGD COMMUNITY
Challenge the model, contribute evidence and keep authority explicit.
OpenRGD welcomes questions, competing implementations, negative results and critical review. Different kinds of participation use different channels so discussion, bugs, normative proposals, security reports and community conduct do not collapse into one queue.
TECHNICAL CULTURE
Strong disagreement is allowed.
Evidence, architecture, benchmarks and OpenRGD itself can be criticized directly. The Code of Conduct protects people and the integrity of the technical record; it is not a mechanism for suppressing good-faith engineering disagreement.
CURRENT STEWARDSHIP
Human accountability remains explicit.
The canonical governance record names Pasquale Ranieri (@phate6872) as current project steward. AI systems may assist with drafting, review and analysis, but a human maintainer remains accountable for normative acceptance, merge and release.